Red Sox: the only team not to have signed any free agents (from the Majors)

Red Sox: the only team not to have signed any free agents (from the Majors)
Credit: The Boston Globe

Yesterday, the Colorado Rockies signed a player, which contributed to the Red Sox looking bad.

Why do I say that? Because following Michael Lorenzen's signing with the Rockies, the Red Sox found themselves alone in a category that doesn't make the club look good.

Which one?

Excluding minor league deals, Boston spent a whopping $0 on free agents this winter. The other 29 organizations spent more than the Red Sox.

Obviously, you have to take everything with a grain of salt. Red Sox bosses have still made several trades (including picking up anything that moves in St. Louis) to improve for next year.

They also have offers on the table and interest in several free agents. If Alex Bregman were less greedy, for example, Boston would have a big signing to announce.

But even if the off-season isn't over and everything can change very quickly, the fact remains that being the ONLY team not to have spent on free agents makes the club look bad.

And those who think the owner is cheap won't change their minds by reading my headline, let's say. But it's still factually true.

This content was created with the help of AI.